Dell Latitude 2110

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude 2110  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0M57NM
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20100309
Uptime46.9 Days
Run DateApr 04 '20 at 02:49
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N470
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Memory 5.91
1-Core 3.3
2-Core 3.7
3% 4.3 Pts
4-Core 5
8-Core 9
1% 7 Pts
64-Core 4
0% 4 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 27%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 160GB (2010)-$50
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 19 26 19 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 30.6
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 20.4
19% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
MC Read 0.4
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 0.9
3% 1 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.73 GB/s
Latency 444
9% 444 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback