Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion GB210AA-AB8 m8050.tr (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek LEONITE
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '20 at 11:56
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6420-$190 2,091 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Memory 65.4 1-Core 24.2 2-Core 44.6 32% 44.7 Pts	4-Core 48 8-Core 47 6% 47.5 Pts	64-Core 47.2 3% 47.2 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1600 19 User benchmarks, average bench 0% MSI(1462 0400) 512MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.23% Terrible	Lighting 0.43 Reflection 0.54 Parallax 0.47 0% 0.48 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.23% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-120 120GB 1,034 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 90 51 41 39 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29% Poor	Read 121 Write 60.4 Mixed 111 SusWrite 72.1 20% 91 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 14.5 57% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 89.1 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 24.2 25% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x0.5GB 2,291 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 19%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16