PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B450M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190307 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 03 '20 at 10:54 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 56% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 22 29 26 24 30 MB/s
|
8.56%
Terrible
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
419GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 167 167 167 169 168 MB/s
|
88.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
60.6%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 2,259x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,964x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 735x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 1,080x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 647x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 594x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 105% - Outstanding | Total price: $360 |