ADD TO PC
BUILD

Anabelleb Pedra BA10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Anabelleb Pedra BA10 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DB75EN
Memory	8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '20 at 06:47
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 192 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 375 50% 374 Pts	64-Core 371 23% 371 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D92) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Lighting 61 Reflection 57.4 Parallax 50.2 50% 56.2 fps	MRender 45.7 Gravity 53.2 Splatting 51.5 41% 50.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 34 38 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 91.3 Write 51.8 Mixed 38 SusWrite 38 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 61%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 44GB free Firmware: JP2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 74 77 77 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 38.3 Write 76.8 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 76.1 38% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1870EF48E8W1333 0443 RMR1870EF48E8W1333 0707 GU512303EP0202 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.5% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.2 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 16.8 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback