Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3000 201 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 46.7 1-Core 20.6 2-Core 41.3 25% 36.2 Pts	4-Core 39.4 8-Core 41 5% 40.2 Pts	64-Core 39 2% 39 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 22B1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.82% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 2.44 2% 2.43 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 4.09 2% 2.94 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.82% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CHN mSATAQ3 120 120GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0423A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 167 29 39 40 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 399 Write 327 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 93.6 46% 211 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 0.9 28% 8.8 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 15.9 DQ Mixed 1.2 15% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 2x4GB 1,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 5.6 19% 6.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Surfboard

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3000IntelBench 23%, 201 samples	3x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	3x

SSD
mSATAQ3 120 120GBCHNBench 51%, 54 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19B 8GBHynixBench 28%, 3 samples	1x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	1x
CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 2x4GBCrucialBench 46%, 1,163 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16