Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180327
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '20 at 19:40
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 88.1 1-Core 106 2-Core 199 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 597 63% 505 Pts	64-Core 599 37% 599 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	4.18% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 30 Parallax 4.62 4% 13 fps	MRender 6.43 Gravity 4.03 Splatting 9 6% 6.49 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.18% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT23B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 300 305 306 307 306 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 320 Mixed 306 SusWrite 301 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 85 4K Mixed 32.3 133% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 247 212% 314 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 126%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 927GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 121 121 121 122 121 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 152 Write 116 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 118 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GB 1,974 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	44.3% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 12.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 13.6 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	342x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	72x
Core i3-7100HIntelBench 56%, 141 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	246x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	107x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	64x

SSD
MX300 SATA M.2 275GBCrucial $42Bench 80%, 16,792 samples	22x
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	17x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	14x

RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	27x
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBHynixBench 71%, 801 samples	23x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16