Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180831
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '20 at 18:35
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	45%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 101 2-Core 198 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 563 57% 464 Pts	64-Core 723 45% 723 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8669) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 176 Reflection 132 Parallax 130 143% 146 fps	MRender 178 Gravity 112 Splatting 123 110% 138 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 491GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 232 282 265 267 263 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 260 Write 285 Mixed 164 SusWrite 257 54% 241 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 31.8 110% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 93.3 DQ Mixed 85.3 97% 173 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 450GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 93 84 85 84 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 69.7 Write 88.5 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 85.2 56% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 66% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	69.3% Good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 23.1 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.5 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	881x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	546x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	471x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	284x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	243x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	203x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	133x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $554

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16