HP 255 G6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 255 G6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8330
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171117
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 02 '20 at 11:21
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 47
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 72.5
36% 57.9 Pts
4-Core 80.1
8-Core 83.6
11% 81.8 Pts
64-Core 78.3
5% 78.3 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
HP(103C 8330) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Lighting 2.93
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 4.81
2% 4.18 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 3
Splatting 3.48
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-256G-1006 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6103006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 367
Write 285
Mixed 193
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 31.1
105% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 144
108% 146 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 2.3
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255 G6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback