ZET- book

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemZET- book  (all builds)
MotherboardZET-book
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '20 at 10:27
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 56.8
1-Core 22.1
2-Core 43.9
29% 40.9 Pts
4-Core 70.9
8-Core 80
10% 75.4 Pts
64-Core 79
5% 79 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 0F31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 1
1% 1.01 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST750LM030-1KKG62 750GB
674GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 85 96 98 104 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 108
Write 89.7
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 91.4
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback