Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	7.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2276M 1,872 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Memory 88.2 1-Core 144 2-Core 282 94% 171 Pts	4-Core 543 8-Core 831 85% 687 Pts	64-Core 999 62% 999 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 229B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7810 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.12% Terrible	Lighting 6.63 Reflection 142 Parallax 8.97 5% 52.6 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 7.5 Splatting 16.9 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.12% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000L7 2TB 523 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 3M2QEXG7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1953 2099 2246 2018 1405 1419 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	339% Outstanding	Read 2,347 Write 2,156 Mixed 1,176 SusWrite 1,857 422% 1,884 MB/s	4K Read 58.6 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 82.1 270% 94.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,171 DQ Write 971 DQ Mixed 1,080 806% 1,074 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 339% Great: 369%
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000L7 2TB 523 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 1.5TB free Firmware: 3M2QEXG7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2131 2267 2314 1901 1287 1319 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	340% Outstanding	Read 2127 Write 2,118 Mixed 1,221 SusWrite 1,870 412% 1,834 MB/s	4K Read 61.7 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 84.7 279% 97.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,298 DQ Write 1,127 DQ Mixed 1,199 902% 1,208 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 340% Great: 369%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB 18,166 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 44 110 109 109 110 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 115 Write 63.5 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 97.1 60% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.6 171% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD M474A4G43MB1-CTD M471A4G43MB1-CTD M474A4G43MB1-CTD 127GB 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.5% Excellent	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 26.8 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 35.8 SC Mixed 26.4 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	33x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 90%, 1,330 samples	28x
Quadro RTX 3000NvidiaBench 67%, 3,632 samples	14x

SSD
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TBWDCBench 250%, 4,445 samples	15x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TBSamsungBench 289%, 9,415 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	7x

RAM
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 82%, 1,927 samples	15x
M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GBSamsungBench 79%, 5,545 samples	13x
M471A4G43MB1-CTD 1x31GBSamsungBench 43%, 2,778 samples	7x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16