Asus P9X79 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 19:25
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 187
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 550
57% 460 Pts
64-Core 623
38% 623 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 2678) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
29.3% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 42.9
27% 37 fps
MRender 49
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 35.8
33% 41.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 286 315 290 308 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 439
Write 348
Mixed 320
SusWrite 299
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 20.7
82% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 72.7
DQ Mixed 118
115% 192 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
263GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 73 80 77 82 77 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 328
Write 130
Mixed 196
SusWrite 77.5
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 17.2
61% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 61
DQ Mixed 104
84% 125 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
346GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 109 103 114 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64% Good
Read 117
Write 101
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 106
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64%
Great: 69%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 74 71 75 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 162
Write 122
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 72.4
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
321% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 107%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
4TB free, PID 25ee
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 111 121 117 124 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 146
Write 147
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 118
152% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 98%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
2TB free, PID 25ee
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 116 108 122 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 114
Write 111
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 114
130% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C10 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 24.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 DELUXE Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 DELUXE - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,060
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback