| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160408 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 19 '17 at 21:18 |
| Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.7%
Very good
|
82% 145 Pts
|
46% 345 Pts
|
21% 343 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 36BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.6%
Average
|
41% 50.4 fps
|
49% 60.8 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
40.4%
Average
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
62% 64 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,112 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 392x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 381x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 352x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 399x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 345x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 217x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $234 |