Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 02:14
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 77.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 282
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 747
78% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,017
63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 36.5
31% 35.6 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 35
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 296 299 300 300 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 490
Write 296
Mixed 285
SusWrite 299
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 31.8
136% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 171
138% 196 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
742GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 113 112 113 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 59
SusWrite 112
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 63%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 8GB
4GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.4 4.1 4 3.8 4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 8.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 4.1
13% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.6
170% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 34.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 30.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,867 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $599
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback