Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus M4A79XTD EVO (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090717
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '17 at 17:50
Run Duration	273 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 81 1-Core 48.4 2-Core 94.5 49% 74.6 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 187 24% 184 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 4870 22,563 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Sapphire(174B E118) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.961.0.0 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Lighting 15.5 Reflection 13 Parallax 11.1 13% 13.2 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 18.8 12% 13.4 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 892GB free Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 90 10798 (03) Spinup time 94 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1823 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 483 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 12939560760 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6411 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 6 (0C) Power cycle count 99 37 1761 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 89 51540459570 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 34 30181222776861 (C2) HDA temperature 29 66 42949672989 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 28 15 10798 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1189 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1189 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 20	47.2% Average	Read 90 Write 74.2 Mixed 33.9 48% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.46 113% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 145GB free Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 223757327 (03) Spinup time 94 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1966 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 71 60 12933738766 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7445 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1840 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 5 (BD) vendor-specific 93 93 7 (BE) vendor-specific 71 37 21204741062685 (C2) HDA temperature 29 63 42949672989 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 21 223757327 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	37.3% Below average	Read 66.1 Write 63.8 Mixed 34.9 41% 54.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.33 83% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 59%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 91 91 3580 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1457 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4253 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1451 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 84 42 269090832 (C2) HDA temperature 73 40 752072917019 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1171339 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 7 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	49.1% Average	Read 82.2 Write 89.1 Mixed 69.6 60% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.29 72% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 62%
TOSHIBA MK3252GSX 320GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 268GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 27.5 Mixed 14.3 28% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 0.66 4K Mixed 0.22 31% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 15%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB 498 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 88GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 21.7 Write 18.8 Mixed 5.57 18% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.26 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.14 60% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.3% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 11.7 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 7.6 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	26x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	26x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	12x

GPU
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	13x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
C300-CTFDDAC128M 128GBCrucialBench 47%, 288 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	27x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	14x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $111

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16