EVGA 151-IB-E699

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemEVGA E699 0.0
MotherboardEVGA 151-IB-E699  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130307
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 31 '20 at 15:57
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 76.2
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 99.6
49% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 285
27% 225 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 2773) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.4% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 54.2
34% 44.7 fps
MRender 53.7
Gravity 46.1
Splatting 35.7
36% 45.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 201 217 213 215 214 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.2% Above average
Read 241
Write 234
Mixed 222
SusWrite 201
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 23.9
82% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 146
124% 182 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 91%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
233GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 378 425 407 421 424 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 439
Mixed 354
SusWrite 385
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 32.3
105% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 220
204% 315 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 113%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 240GB-$193
65GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 0 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Write 116
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 23.7
11% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 0.1
5% 3.2 MB/s
DQ Read 0.1
DQ Write 50.7
DQ Mixed 0.9
8% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 91%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
383GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 280 318 299 315 318 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 392
Write 323
Mixed 273
SusWrite 286
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 29.1
98% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 111
84% 113 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 105%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 107 106 107 108 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 112
Write 104
Mixed 77
SusWrite 105
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.5
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 151-IB-E699 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: EVGA 151-IB-E699

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $496
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback