Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 80% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO (all builds)
Memory	15.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '20 at 13:28
Run Duration	267 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 182 74% 124 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 614 61% 496 Pts	64-Core 822 51% 822 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	106% Outstanding	Lighting 137 Reflection 147 Parallax 124 112% 136 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 137 Splatting 111 97% 119 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 227GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1022 776 776 778 777 776 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	246% Outstanding	Read 2,381 Write 2,190 Mixed 1,681 SusWrite 817 395% 1,767 MB/s	4K Read 52.5 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 72.2 232% 79 MB/s	DQ Read 764 DQ Write 509 DQ Mixed 705 507% 659 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 246% Great: 355%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 117GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 275 275 275 275 274 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 469 Mixed 327 SusWrite 283 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 81.4 4K Mixed 48.5 164% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 210 197% 307 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 85GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 300 302 293 283 303 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 471 Mixed 403 SusWrite 315 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 86.7 4K Mixed 50.2 169% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 352 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 124%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB 7,767 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 191GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 61 62 65 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 45.7 Write 47.2 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 62.2 36% 48.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 123%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 449GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 95 95 95 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 91 Write 92 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 94.4 62% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 86%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB 1,232 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 559GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 107 106 106 107 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 90.5 Write 65 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 106 104% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 44%
Lexar MSD USB_3_0 Read 32GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 26GB free, PID b050 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 22 22 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Read 22 Write 21.2 Mixed 20 SusWrite 21.2 29% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 4 264% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G 32GB 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	112% Outstanding	MC Read 43.7 MC Write 43.4 MC Mixed 44.1 125% 43.7 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 21.4 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 66%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	224x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	86x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	39x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	38x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	26x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GBKingstonBench 90%, 4,583 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $90Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	10x
BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 4x8GBCrucialBench 107%, 871 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $1,119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16