Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DD
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190919
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '20 at 12:43
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 46.7 1-Core 39.7 2-Core 72.7 33% 53 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 379 39% 315 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.30.02 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	6.4% Terrible	Lighting 7.23 Reflection 25.7 Parallax 10.6 6% 14.5 fps	MRender 6.19 Gravity 8.73 Splatting 11.1 7% 8.68 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.4% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GB 7,536 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.T SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 244 245 249 242 243 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 574 Write 627 Mixed 569 SusWrite 286 116% 514 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 41.4 4K Mixed 21.2 75% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 518 DQ Write 427 DQ Mixed 511 372% 485 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 131%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 908GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 137 137 130 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 129 Write 113 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 134 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 207% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB 28,935 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.4% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 13.6 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 15.2 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD Builds (Compare 364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	307x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	57x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	168x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	159x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	37x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	90x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	63x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	45x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	62x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	56x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	40x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16