Asus K55N

Performance Results

Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation 27%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus K55N  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K55N
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '20 at 10:10
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A8-4500M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
48% Average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 70.5
42% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 128
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 134
9% 134 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Asus(1043 105B) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.941.4.6000
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 12.9
4% 15.4 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 18.3
3% 13.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$100
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 122 121 127 119 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 406
Write 259
Mixed 241
SusWrite 125
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 25
98% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 118
117% 188 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.6
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 35%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical K55N Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation 18%

System: Asus K55N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $345Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback