| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Toshiba Satellite A665 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA PHQAA |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111215 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 31 '20 at 02:06 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 71% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
44.4%
Average
|
42% 65.8 Pts
|
23% 188 Pts
|
16% 265 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Toshiba(1179 FC35) 1GB
CLim: 672 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
3.36%
Terrible
|
3% 4.13 fps
|
3% 4.33 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 65 97 108 41 127 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
19% 87.1 MB/s
|
51% 16.5 MB/s
|
62% 117 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
46.4%
Average
|
49% 17.3 GB/s
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
33% 121 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Satellite A665 Builds (Compare 157 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Satellite A665
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples | 30x |
| Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples | 23x |
| Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples | 20x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 65x |
| GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples | 34x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 25x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $218 |