| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 66.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 860-008na (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 2B4B |
| Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150908 |
| Uptime | 15.6 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 31 '20 at 00:00 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.8%
Very good
|
69% 118 Pts
|
54% 437 Pts
|
34% 542 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
HP(103C 2B62) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.02
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
66.8%
Good
|
70% 84.4 fps
|
60% 73.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk SD7SB6S-128G-1006 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 74 53 47 43 43 MB/s
|
63.7%
Good
|
48% 216 MB/s
|
106% 38.2 MB/s
|
154% 227 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
369GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 127 127 126 126 MB/s
|
90.3%
Outstanding
|
99% 135 MB/s
|
148% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
63%
Good
|
66% 23.1 GB/s
|
44% 15.4 GB/s
|
49% 82.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 860-008na Builds (Compare 7 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 860-008na
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 5x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $820 |