HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8309
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '20 at 22:09
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 71.9 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 184 67% 118 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 468 48% 385 Pts	64-Core 478 30% 478 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580 6,488 User benchmarks, average bench 41% HP(103C 840E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.3.1 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.4% Average	Lighting 48 Reflection 65 Parallax 68.2 39% 60.4 fps	MRender 65.4 Gravity 50.9 Splatting 53.5 46% 56.6 fps
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB70H1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,726 Write 742 Mixed 542 218% 1,003 MB/s	4K Read 51.2 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 60.1 210% 72.1 MB/s	DQ Read 756 DQ Write 585 DQ Mixed 635 485% 659 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 638GB free Firmware: MS2OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 171 171 171 171 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 166 Mixed 33.1 SusWrite 170 99% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB 22,600 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 14.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 96.9 41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	512x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	218x
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	216x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	324x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	229x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	141x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	166x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	86x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	69x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	201x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	135x
HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 2,884 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16