Asrock B85M DASH/OL R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B85M DASH/OL R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	16.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150123
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '20 at 21:59
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	65%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 85.5 1-Core 76.2 2-Core 145 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 538 49% 410 Pts	64-Core 531 33% 531 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% PowerColor(148C 3001) 3GB CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.3.1 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.4% Poor	Lighting 32 Reflection 18 Parallax 35.6 26% 28.5 fps	MRender 19.7 Gravity 47.3 Splatting 23 24% 30 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 481 Write 457 Mixed 376 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 83.7 4K Mixed 49.8 165% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 358 270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB 16,136 User benchmarks, average bench 283% 41GB free Firmware: R0906I SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 292 301 307 302 306 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 368 Write 338 Mixed 341 SusWrite 295 76% 336 MB/s	4K Read 50.8 4K Write 93.6 4K Mixed 64.8 210% 69.7 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 471 318% 387 MB/s
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 373%
Jmicron Generic 128GB 413 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 19GB free Firmware: 0508 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 133 133 133 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 384 Write 134 Mixed 162 SusWrite 132 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 18.1 71% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 42 DQ Mixed 51.7 46% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 69%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB 7,786 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 126 127 127 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 88.5 Write 104 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 126 73% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.6 163% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$110 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 141 146 142 144 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 110 Write 100 Mixed 104 SusWrite 141 84% 113 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.6 351% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 90%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: 0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 177 173 174 176 174 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 166 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 175 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.7 201% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 74GB free Firmware: MX6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 99 99 99 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 98.5 Write 88 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 98.4 53% 74 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 107%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 128GB 589 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 98GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 38 21 41 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 42.2 Write 40.5 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 33.6 48% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 3.3 218% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1302 1600 CL9 Series 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1302 1600 CL9 Series 24GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 18.7 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 14 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M DASH/OL R2.0 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock B85M DASH/OL R2.0

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	13x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	13x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	11x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	7x

SSD
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 89%, 201,200 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 10,062 samples	4x
CT102464BA160B.C16 16GBUnknownBench 47%, 414 samples	4x
1600 CL9 Series 4x4GBUnknownBench 57%, 1,859 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16