| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus B150M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151208 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 30 '20 at 16:57 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78.2%
Very good
|
77% 134 Pts
|
53% 399 Pts
|
25% 398 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
|
18.4%
Very poor
|
19% 20.4 fps
|
18% 22.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 70 69 68 67 65 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
74% 330 MB/s
|
194% 69.3 MB/s
|
243% 336 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
412GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 187 187 191 192 191 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
116% 158 MB/s
|
147% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
42.6%
Average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
57% 70.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B150M-A Builds (Compare 1,242 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus B150M-A - $285
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 254x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 243x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 234x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 136x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 130x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 119x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $888 |