Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Extreme (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111028
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '20 at 14:10
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 80.6 1-Core 52.3 2-Core 105 51% 79.2 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 287 30% 240 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% PNY(196E 085A) 1GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	8.21% Terrible	Lighting 9.57 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 8.06 8% 9.62 fps	MRender 12.7 Gravity 9.87 Splatting 10.7 9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.21% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 960GB 240 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 723GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 88 84 18 71 76 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.5% Average	Read 256 Write 115 Mixed 195 SusWrite 69 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 28.2 98% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 92.9 DQ Write 23.4 DQ Mixed 83.8 55% 66.7 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 90%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 301GB free Firmware: MU04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 80 81 96 85 78 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.7% Above average	Read 282 Write 134 Mixed 138 SusWrite 84.9 35% 160 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 52 4K Mixed 26.4 98% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 93 DQ Write 88.4 DQ Mixed 73.6 60% 85 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 105%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 930GB free Firmware: JP4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 122 122 122 122 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 134 Write 78 Mixed 65 SusWrite 121 73% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 74%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 931GB free Firmware: JP4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 120 121 121 121 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 132 Write 110 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 120 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 74%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 584GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 89 89 90 91 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 128 Write 130 Mixed 82.7 SusWrite 89.2 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 87%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 4TB 232 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 158 163 162 162 162 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 222 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 161 118% 162 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 206%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TB 1,183 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 383GB free Firmware: 1.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 148 148 148 145 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 140 Write 150 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 146 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.8 346% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 195%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL7-4GBXH F3-10666CL7-4GBXH F3-10666CL7-4GBXH F3-10666CL7-4GBXH 16GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.6% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 12.5 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 8.2 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Extreme Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 47%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

CPU
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	15x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	11x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	3x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $155Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	2x

RAM
CMT8GX3M4A1866C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 49%, 53 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 2000 C10 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 102 samples	3x
Dominator DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 2,880 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $778

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16