PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+ (all builds) |
Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190218 |
Uptime | 2.7 Days |
Run Date | Mar 29 '20 at 23:34 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A8-7680 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 112 111 107 104 96 MB/s
|
68.8%
Good
|
|||
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
108GB free
Firmware: HH100-08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 39 37 46 46 MB/s
|
28.8%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT102464BD160B.M16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
19.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-7680 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 43%, 2,565 samples | 62x |
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 48x |
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 39x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples | 37x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 36x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 25x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |