Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5650 13,757 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 73.6 2-Core 143 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 412 40% 332 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% PwrHis(1787 3000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Lighting 24 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 30.9 20% 28.4 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 24 Splatting 31.3 23% 28 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Onda A-24 240GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 237 237 215 124 125 MB/s Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.8% Above average	Read 254 Write 234 Mixed 210 SusWrite 195 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 19.1 85% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 30.7 53% 104 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1600, 33 MHz 16384, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.8% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 7.2 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 7.4 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 50%

Yacht

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	1x

SSD
T253A3512G 512GBTeamBench 79%, 575 samples	1x

RAM
SP008GLLTU160N02 SP008GLLTU160N02 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GBUnknownBench 36%, 1 sample	1x
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GBMicronBench 38%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 143% - Outstanding

Total price: $132

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16