PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C09 |
Motherboard | MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds) |
Memory | 12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190904 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 29 '20 at 09:56 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 49% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
|
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 134 142 80 71 81 MB/s
|
55.3%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
486GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 82 79 81 79 MB/s
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
71.7%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,311x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,500x |
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 291x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 635x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 462x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 356x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $359 |