| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160919 |
| Uptime | 14.9 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 29 '20 at 05:16 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 28% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
79.2%
Very good
|
75% 131 Pts
|
55% 404 Pts
|
23% 371 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
|
31.2%
Below average
|
31% 35.5 fps
|
31% 37.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1230C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 104 55 52 58 51 MB/s
|
77.5%
Very good
|
69% 308 MB/s
|
136% 51.7 MB/s
|
186% 261 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
307GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 126 120 128 129 128 MB/s
|
87.5%
Excellent
|
95% 132 MB/s
|
140% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
62.1%
Good
|
63% 21.9 GB/s
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
57% 70.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,409 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 211x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 186x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 167x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 176x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 167x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 108x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |