LG 14Z90N-V.AA75A3

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	LG 14Z90N-V.AA75A3 (all builds)
Motherboard	LG 14Z90N
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '20 at 04:06
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	83%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 127 2-Core 148 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 408 43% 343 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7 52,498 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(1854 0365) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7463 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	11% Very poor	Lighting 14.6 Reflection 8.35 Parallax 8.66 12% 10.5 fps	MRender 9.67 Gravity 8.77 Splatting 14.4 9% 11 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 324GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 878 822 807 821 812 814 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 1,550 Write 1,332 Mixed 1,158 SusWrite 826 273% 1,217 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 58.5 192% 69.2 MB/s	DQ Read 654 DQ Write 588 DQ Mixed 669 489% 637 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 355%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 477GB free Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 860 597 636 641 578 627 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	188% Outstanding	Read 1,520 Write 1,317 Mixed 1,153 SusWrite 657 260% 1,162 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 53.7 178% 65.8 MB/s	DQ Read 698 DQ Write 698 DQ Mixed 252 312% 550 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 188% Great: 296%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB 1,029 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	80% Excellent	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 23.8 84% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 19.7 65% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

LG 14Z90N-V.AA75A3

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)