Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE_FX705GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705GE_FX705GE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705GE
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200108
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 15:01
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 657
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 833
52% 833 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1B3E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 7.34
6% 8.49 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 6.67
Splatting 14.7
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1B3E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 29.7
32% 32.5 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 35.5
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 136 135 134 131 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 886
Write 168
Mixed 266
SusWrite 139
79% 364 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 35.2
144% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 171
137% 195 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 129%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
565GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 113 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 146
Write 140
Mixed 56
SusWrite 113
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
242% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston 9905624-045.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.5% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 22.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 24.6
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX705GE_FX705GE Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE_FX705GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback