| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170406 |
| Uptime | 1.9 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 28 '20 at 14:35 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.5%
Very good
|
75% 137 Pts
|
73% 596 Pts
|
58% 936 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.3%
Above average
|
58% 69.9 fps
|
56% 68.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 45 39 38 24 51 MB/s
|
30%
Poor
|
17% 72.2 MB/s
|
72% 32 MB/s
|
47% 101 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
54GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 95 97 97 97 MB/s
|
57.2%
Above average
|
58% 80.2 MB/s
|
170% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.7%
Below average
|
35% 12.3 GB/s
|
41% 14.5 GB/s
|
41% 96.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,523 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 416x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 326x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 204x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 214x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 194x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 188x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $847 |