HP 500-205eo

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-205eo  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory5.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140115
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 13:54
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ARM-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-670K (2013 D.Ri)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 109
46% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 162
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645
Device(1B0A 90CC) 2GB
CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
9.8% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 13.2
9% 11.7 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 12.2
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.8%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SDSA6GM-016G-1006 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: U221006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 51 51 50 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 229
Write 49.7
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 50.3
21% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 8
38% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 13.9
12% 17.5 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 28%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 68 92 90 118 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 65.1
Write 97.3
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 98.5
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
53% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.3 5.5 5.5 5.1 5.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 7.3
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 5.1
12% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2
128% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 17%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
12GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 23 25 24 26 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 27.7
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 22.8
36% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
57% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.1
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-205eo Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-205eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback