Monster TULPAR T7 V19.5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V19.5  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V19.5
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 13:16
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 264
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 859
83% 684 Pts
64-Core 1053
65% 1053 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 105D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4575
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 116
Parallax 112
96% 115 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 107
Splatting 97.2
97% 123 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1181 290 290 290 290 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,748
Write 1,253
Mixed 708
SusWrite 438
230% 1,037 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 79
265% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 1,142
DQ Mixed 1,024
782% 1,049 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 226%
Great: 249%
Adata SX6000LNP 128GB
99GB free
Firmware: V9001c01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 568 571 571 557 569 484 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,106
Write 570
Mixed 548
SusWrite 553
154% 694 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 53.5
201% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 287
238% 333 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 156%
Great: 197%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31100TNTD 1TB
328GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 419 425 452 455 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 129
Mixed 319
SusWrite 435
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 33.5
120% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 208
182% 270 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 22
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 26.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V19.5 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V19.5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback