Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics78.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 05:16
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 121
57% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 358
36% 291 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.8% Very good
Lighting 93.7
Reflection 125
Parallax 116
76% 112 fps
MRender 95.9
Gravity 124
Splatting 89.9
83% 103 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 274 280 277 281 274 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 431
Write 380
Mixed 202
SusWrite 282
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 26.1
89% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 206
166% 236 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 84 78 90 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 116
Write 74
Mixed 67
SusWrite 83.5
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
466GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 72.3
Write 60.7
Mixed 45
SusWrite 75.6
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB
2TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 99 98 99 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 110
Write 92.8
Mixed 66
SusWrite 97.9
122% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.8
245% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer 123GB
113GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 9.8 8.5 8.4 8.6 8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 16
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 8.2
23% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0
47% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10%
Great: 18%
WD My Passport 0827 3TB
2TB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 22 22 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 26
Write 25.7
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 21.7
34% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 16
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 13.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback