Acer Aspire TC-705

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire TC-705 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-705
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150611
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '20 at 03:38
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 195 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 533 53% 433 Pts	64-Core 520 32% 520 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% HP(103C 8554) ≥ 4GB; HP NVIDIA RTX 2070 8GB GDDR6 GEFORCE GPU OMEN OBELISK GAMING VIDEO CARD L34256 CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	100% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 117 Parallax 131 101% 124 fps	MRender 168 Gravity 118 Splatting 92 99% 126 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 201 214 216 210 209 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	75.2% Very good	Read 253 Write 240 Mixed 216 SusWrite 206 52% 229 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 43.7 140% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 191 143% 191 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 191GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 18 77 77 75 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 45.2 Write 43.5 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 57.7 29% 39.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 16.6 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 16.4 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-705 Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-705

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	250x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	207x
Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples	36x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	89x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	69x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	23x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x

RAM
ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G 12GBKingstonBench 43%, 447 samples	60x
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 12GBHynixBench 42%, 1,188 samples	55x
ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 2,154 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16