Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA530
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190606
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 00:49
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 222
85% 145 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 665
72% 558 Pts
64-Core 556
37% 556 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2004) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 85.2
Parallax 8.62
6% 33.6 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 7.37
Splatting 16.3
7% 12.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57XA Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 34 49 48 42 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 205%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 21.9
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 26.1
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback