Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 118% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME (all builds)
Memory	46.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '20 at 15:36
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$515 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 87.2 1-Core 134 2-Core 267 90% 163 Pts	4-Core 491 8-Core 970 86% 730 Pts	64-Core 2,705 167% 2,705 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.77 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 138 Parallax 116 111% 130 fps	MRender 94.4 Gravity 128 Splatting 107 90% 109 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 223GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 669 531 533 534 530 529 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	192% Outstanding	Read 1,402 Write 1,199 Mixed 555 SusWrite 554 206% 928 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 44.6 172% 64.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,137 DQ Write 1,095 DQ Mixed 852 712% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 192% Great: 254%
Seagate FireCuda 510 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB 1,901 User benchmarks, average bench 259% 1TB free Firmware: STES1020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 685 641 696 717 656 700 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 1,064 Mixed 727 SusWrite 683 170% 745 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 85.1 4K Mixed 26.1 105% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,116 DQ Write 1,038 DQ Mixed 1,047 794% 1,067 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 385%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 171 171 170 172 171 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 61.8 Write 108 Mixed 64.3 SusWrite 169 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.5 157% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB 12,538 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 47.8 MC Write 40.9 MC Mixed 42.1 125% 43.6 GB/s	SC Read 26.2 SC Write 26.6 SC Mixed 37.5 86% 30.1 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 139%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 207%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 248%

UFO

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	69x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	37x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	21x
F4-3600C18-32GTZN 4x31.8GBG.SKILLBench 118%, 777 samples	16x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $1,895

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16