Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-572  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '20 at 00:41
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 168
72% 117 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 342
45% 330 Pts
64-Core 375
25% 375 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 118B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.72
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 193
Reflection 188
Parallax 191
51% 190 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 188
Splatting 151
52% 161 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.1 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 622 451 442 463 455 462 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 903
Write 1,247
Mixed 1,003
SusWrite 482
205% 909 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 53.5
171% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 772
572% 749 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 152%
Great: 255%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$100
249GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 226 6.7 6.6 6.4 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 392
Write 340
Mixed 339
SusWrite 92.8
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 15.7
84% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 37.1
82% 163 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 102%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
931GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 39.3
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 38.8
50% 37 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20%
Great: 27%
ASMT 2105 2TB
523GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 36 50 33 33 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 3.7
Write 49
Mixed 16
SusWrite 37.2
42% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.6% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 26.1
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 4,692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Acer Predator G3-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $365Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback