Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

CPU throttled at 33% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Toshiba Qosmio X75-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '20 at 22:53
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	33%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 22.1 2-Core 38.1 30% 41.2 Pts	4-Core 74.8 8-Core 106 11% 90.2 Pts	64-Core 112 7% 112 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FA77) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3282 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.66% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 14.7 Parallax 6.75 4% 8.83 fps	MRender 9.62 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 8.78 6% 6.92 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.66% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 217GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH2OA900 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 52 77 82 91 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 94.3 Write 105 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 66.7 53% 72.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.2 81% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 466GB free Firmware: GH2OA900 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 18 18 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GB 1,523 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	42.4% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 16.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 7 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio X75-A Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	72x
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	3x
Core i7-4702MQIntelBench 61%, 21,618 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	47x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	30x

SSD
HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GBToshiba $167Bench 71%, 1,242 samples	29x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	3x
M4 256GBCrucial $218Bench 61%, 17,938 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,045 samples	15x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples	8x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,054 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16