Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	9.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1746 x 982 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '20 at 22:11
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Memory 96.8 1-Core 140 2-Core 274 95% 170 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 837 85% 688 Pts	64-Core 1,099 68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Asus(1043 8731) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	9.47% Terrible	Lighting 10.7 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 11.8 9% 10.9 fps	MRender 17.8 Gravity 9.6 Splatting 13 11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 9.47% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 290GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 399 415 390 400 396 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 337 Write 401 Mixed 290 SusWrite 394 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 37.8 128% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 164 167% 272 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 111%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 129 129 130 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 153 Write 144 Mixed 83.7 SusWrite 129 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 33.7 MC Mixed 23.5 86% 30.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 24.6 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 51.1 78% 51.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	119x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	106x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	98x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	39x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	28x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	28x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	22x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	20x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 113% - Outstanding

Total price: $505

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16