Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon TF-20 408 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket S1G1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 50.9 1-Core 8.8 2-Core 10.2 20% 23.3 Pts	4-Core 16.9 8-Core 11 2% 13.9 Pts	64-Core 15.4 1% 15.4 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 028D) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	0.43% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.77 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.56 fps	MRender 0.52 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.74 0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.43% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 15 17 19 21 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.58% Terrible	Read 5.4 Write 11.5 Mixed 8.8 SusWrite 17.3 8% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.2 41% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 6.58% Great: 36%
Generic- Multi-Card 32GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 28GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 14 14 12 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	5.82% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 8.2 Mixed 3 SusWrite 12.9 12% 9.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.8 38% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.82% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS256MSQ64V6U Samsung M4 70T2864QZ3-CE6 3GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 333, 333 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	2.92% Terrible	MC Read 0.4 MC Write 0.1 MC Mixed 0.6 1% 0.37 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.4 GB/s	Latency 157 25% 157 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.92% Great: 18%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16