| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | Asus K55VM (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK K55VM |
| Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120523 |
| Uptime | 9 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 26 '20 at 17:39 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
| CPU Throttled | 60% |
PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.1%
Average
|
38% 56.3 Pts
|
20% 160 Pts
|
12% 192 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M
Asus(1043 1447) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4788
|
1.37%
Terrible
|
0% 0.2 fps
|
4% 5.07 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 40 42 44 42 MB/s
|
29.1%
Poor
|
34% 46.7 MB/s
|
104% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
49.5%
Average
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
21% 7.3 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical K55VM Builds (Compare 223 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus K55VM
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples | 113x |
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 94x |
| Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 174x |
| GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples | 44x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $328 |