Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180319
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 15:00
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 220
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 721
69% 567 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.2% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 105
Parallax 95.1
92% 104 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 126
Splatting 101
105% 133 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 262 199 82 106 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 558
Write 561
Mixed 517
SusWrite 184
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 45
154% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 497
DQ Mixed 324
264% 366 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 157%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
38GB free
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 315 51 53 22 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 484
Write 426
Mixed 384
SusWrite 110
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 26
117% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 1
68% 158 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 102%
T-force 1TB 1TB
472GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 330 338 347 345 345 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 463
Mixed 406
SusWrite 340
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 48.1
157% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 124
155% 276 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 106%
Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 45 44 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
WD My Book 25EE 3TB
468GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 36 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 36.5
Write 35.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 35.4
46% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 25.2
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $263
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback