PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP EliteBook 8730w (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 30EC |
Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100126 |
Uptime | 2.9 Days |
Run Date | Mar 26 '20 at 13:55 |
Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme X9100-$150
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
|
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M
HP(103C 0539) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
|
5.97%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474
924GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 224 213 232 237 235 MB/s
|
61.1%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR2
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 14x |
Core2 Duo T9400Intel $55Bench 39%, 3,295 samples | 7x |
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro FX 2700MNvidiaBench 3%, 788 samples | 23x |
Mobility Radeon HD 3670ATIBench 2%, 405 samples | 13x |
Quadro FX 3700MNvidiaBench 6%, 383 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $230 |