Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	7.96% Terrible	Memory 9.23 1-Core 23.3 2-Core 32.3 12% 21.6 Pts	4-Core 38.3 8-Core 41.2 5% 39.8 Pts	64-Core 43.5 3% 43.5 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.96% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GB 10,347 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 96 84 87 90 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 306 Write 203 Mixed 195 SusWrite 93 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 25 68% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 84.7 DQ Mixed 95.8 72% 96.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 89%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB 1,916 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 256GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 30 33 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 35 Mixed 23 SusWrite 32.8 42% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB 50,921 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 411 10% 411 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,228x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	415x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	69x

SSD
SD9SN8W-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 76%, 2,721 samples	146x
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	113x
MZNLN256HAJQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 4,927 samples	90x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	119x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	110x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	109x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16