Gigabyte GA-Z270MX-Gaming5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270MX-Gaming5  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 05:48
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 260
93% 165 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 754
77% 621 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2277 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 97.6
Reflection 116
Parallax 99.2
80% 104 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 94.6
Splatting 105
60% 66.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139
76GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,632
Write 8,323
Mixed 8,223
1,875% 8,393 MB/s
4K Read 757
4K Write 292
4K Mixed 296
1,681% 448 MB/s
DQ Read 1,523
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 1,153
869% 1,181 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,892
Write 896
Mixed 669
252% 1,152 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 53.5
208% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 376
356% 579 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 243%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
247GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 111 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 98.8
Write 105
Mixed 67
SusWrite 110
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
274GB free
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 88 85 84 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 89
Write 83
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 85
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2992 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 28.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 28.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270MX-Gaming5 Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270MX-Gaming5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $534
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback