HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 9470m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 05:06
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-3437U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
27.2% Poor
1-Core 50
2-Core 87.7
33% 68.8 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 131
18% 129 Pts
64-Core 134
9% 134 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18DF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 14
Parallax 9.7
3% 12.2 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 18.9
2% 12.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Micron_M510_MSATA_128GB 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DL06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 166 167 169 167 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 350
Write 171
Mixed 203
SusWrite 166
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 17.6
60% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 168
127% 173 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 84%
PNY CS900 120GB-$27
112GB free
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 187 83 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 426
Write 332
Mixed 314
SusWrite 145
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 19
79% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 95.8
DQ Mixed 133
103% 144 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 3,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $220
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $175Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback