PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 7810 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 7810 (all builds) |
Memory | 250.3 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190925 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 25 '20 at 23:41 |
Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 256GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMM02D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 458 453 459 461 460 MB/s
|
99.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275
2TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 463 464 461 462 462 MB/s
|
112%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
122%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 143x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 114x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 88x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 137x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 121x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 80x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 33% - Below average | Total price: $60 |