Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateMar 25 '20 at 22:49
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 230
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 889
87% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,118
69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1361 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.3.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 74.8
Reflection 70.1
Parallax 89
61% 78 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 57
54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 284 279 270 251 244 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 488
Mixed 446
SusWrite 274
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 54
182% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 303
242% 340 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Intel MEMPEK1J016GAD 14GB
13GB free
Firmware: K4110400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 168 168 169 169 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 839
Write 162
Mixed 272
SusWrite 168
78% 360 MB/s
4K Read 154
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 110
420% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 874
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 284
270% 444 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 195%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
803GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 206 208 211 211 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 163
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 209
118% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 117%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
466GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 130 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 68
SusWrite 130
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
930GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 205 205 209 207 205 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 190
Write 94.5
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 206
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 27
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 27.1
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $569
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback