Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive389% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 25 '20 at 06:36
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
96% 172 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 771
78% 632 Pts
64-Core 729
45% 729 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
155% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 208
Parallax 208
175% 210 fps
MRender 250
Gravity 207
Splatting 133
154% 197 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 155%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2075 2265 2304 2327 2015 1138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 2,698
Write 2408
Mixed 1,261
SusWrite 2,021
470% 2,097 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 88.5
314% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,454
DQ Write 1,288
DQ Mixed 1,333
1,010% 1,358 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 389%
Great: 425%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
127GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 471 472 471 473 471 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 482
Mixed 356
SusWrite 472
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 58.7
201% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 335
259% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 127%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
121GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 470 472 471 472 471 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 477
Mixed 404
SusWrite 471
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 51
176% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 358
270% 363 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
913GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 471 472 472 474 472 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 476
Mixed 377
SusWrite 472
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 49.4
176% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
4TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 211 211 211 212 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 236
Mixed 124
SusWrite 212
143% 195 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
421% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 121%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 32.7
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 30.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 52
77% 52 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $910
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback